Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 评测

365bet网投娱乐 2025-09-01 04:44:48 admin 阅读 7696
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 评测

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 评测--无风扇 M4 SoC 领先竞争对手多年功率更大,价格更低。 Apple MacBook Air 15 配备了快如闪电的 M4 SoC,但仍采用被动散热方式。它还配备了新的 1200 万像素网络摄像头和新的配色。不过,它的 60 Hz 显示屏没有变化,也没有哑光选项,但 Air 现在便宜了 100 美元。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/12/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 AI ARM Apple Laptop / Notebook macOS MacBook Thunderbolt

结论:MacBook Air 15 M4 以更低的价格提供更强的性能即使采用了全新的 M4 处理器,MacBook Air 15 在日常使用中仍然是一款整体性能非常出色的产品,它的高 CPU 性能与被动散热相结合,尤其令人印象深刻。即使在持续负载的情况下,该处理器仍然比英特尔的 Lunar Lake 芯片更快,例如,在单核性能方面,M4 处理器至少领先竞争对手两代。在没有风扇的情况下,Windows 世界中根本没有其他设备能达到如此快的速度。

Apple 还将入门级产品的价格降低了 100 美元,但内存和固态硬盘存储的高额附加费以及缺乏可用的维护选项等问题依然没有改变。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Apple Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

它的显示屏也没有任何变化,这可能会让一些消费者失望。如果你想要哑光屏或 120 Hz,你还是得换成更笨重、更昂贵的 MacBook Pro。即便如此,它的 IPS 显示屏在没有 PWM 的情况下仍能提供出色的图像质量。IPS 屏幕需要消耗大量电能,尤其是在高亮度情况下,但总体而言,这款笔记本电脑的电池续航时间仍然一如既往地出色。不过,一些竞争对手,如 ThinkPad X9等竞争对手在图像质量和电池续航时间方面都占据了上风。

MacBook Air 当然可以做得更好,但你也必须考虑到它在产品系列中的地位,因为它是Apple 价格最实惠的系列。此外,配备哑光显示屏和 120 Hz 频率的 MacBook Air 15 自然会影响 MacBook Pro 14 M4 的销售数字。 MacBook Pro 14 M4.

Pros+ 高品质超薄机壳

+ 超快的 M4 SoC

+ 良好的输入设备

+ 永久静音运行

+ 明亮的 P3 显示屏,无 PWM

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 150 尼特的超长电池续航时间

+ 改进的 12 百万像素网络摄像头Cons- 无 Wi-Fi 7 或 120 Hz

- 只有 2x USB-C 接口,没有读卡器

- 电源太弱(35 瓦)

- 没有维护选项,升级费用昂贵

价格和供应情况你可以直接从Apple 订购新款 MacBook Air 15 M4 ,15 英寸机型的起价为 1,199 美元。你也可以在亚马逊等其他主要在线零售商处购买。

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Table of Contents结论:MacBook Air 15 M4 以更低的价格提供更强的性能规格外壳和连接输入设备显示屏 - IPS,60 赫兹性能 - MacBook Air 现配备高达 32GB 内存排放与能源Notebookcheck 总评分

Apple 更新了 MacBook Air 产品线,在笔记本电脑中安装了 M4 处理器。旧的 M3 代的内存已在去年增加到至少 16 GB,但现在 M4 MacBook Air 的内存已增加到 32 GB。令人有些意外的是,Apple ,这两款产品的入门级价格分别降低了 100 美元;配备 16GB 内存和 256GB 固态硬盘的 MacBook Air 15 现在的起价为 1199 美元。我们的测试机配备 1 TB 固态硬盘和 16 GB 内存,MRSP 为 1599 美元。

规格

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4ProcessorApple M4 (10 cores) 10 x 2.9 - 4.5 GHz, 20.5 W PL2 / Short Burst, 9 W PL1 / SustainedGraphics adapterApple M4 10-core GPUMemory16 GB , LPDDR5-7500, onboardDisplay15.30 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1864 pixel 224 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 HzStorageApple SSD AP1024Z, 1024 GB , 955 GB freeConnections2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 11.5 x 340.4 x 237.6Battery66.5 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemApple macOS 15 SequoiaCameraWebcam: 12 MP Center Stage Primary Camera: 12 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: Six-speaker sound system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 35W Dual-USB-C PSU, 12 Months WarrantyWeight1.52 kg, Power Supply: 188 g

Price1999 EuroLinksApple homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

外壳和连接天蓝色 MacBook Air 15 M4(左)与太空灰 MacBook Air 13 M1(右)Apple MacBook 的外壳设计没有任何改变,其 11.5 毫米的纤薄设计依然令人印象深刻。铝合金一体成型机身的质量依然很好,但 Air 15 1.52 千克的重量也不轻。可选颜色有所变化,太空灰被取消,取而代之的是天蓝色。

我们对其制造质量和稳定性仍然没有什么可抱怨的,但其连接情况仍然仅限于 MagSafe 和 2x USB-C。不过值得庆幸的是,这些连接现在都支持 Thunderbolt 4,M4 SoC 除了内部面板外,还可以控制两个外部显示器。维护选项不可用。

Mac 的 Wi-Fi 模块仍然支持包括蓝牙 5.3 在内的 Wi-Fi 6E,在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中,其传输速率非常稳定。网络摄像头有了重大升级,现在安装了一个 1200 万像素的传感器,除了图像跟踪(Center Stage)外,还支持桌面视图。

尺寸比较

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite DIN A4 ❌

左:MagSafe、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4(40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery)

右:3.5 毫米音频

NetworkingApple MacBook Air 15 M4Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1762 (min: 1689) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1618 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼92%

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel BE201 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1656 (min: 1540) MBit/s ∼94%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1568 (min: 1525) MBit/s ∼89%

Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1243 (min: 1139) MBit/s ∼71%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1602 (min: 1438) MBit/s ∼91%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1029 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼68%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1656 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraIntel BE201 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1280 (min: 1203) MBit/s ∼73%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1405 (min: 1272) MBit/s ∼80%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1516 (min: 1367) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1613 (min: 1567) MBit/s ∼97%

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm FastConnect 7800 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1595 (min: 1475) MBit/s ∼91%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1740 (min: 1673) MBit/s ∼99%

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1698 (min: 1601) MBit/s ∼96%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1756 (min: 1717) MBit/s ∼100%

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1762 (1689-1816) Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1618 (1588-1651)

17.6 ∆E13.7 ∆E17.6 ∆E18.7 ∆E16.9 ∆E14.3 ∆E10.1 ∆E14.4 ∆E14.3 ∆E13.6 ∆E9.7 ∆E9 ∆E9.1 ∆E11.6 ∆E17 ∆E7 ∆E16.1 ∆E17.4 ∆E5.9 ∆E8.8 ∆E14.2 ∆E17.4 ∆E16.8 ∆E6.8 ∆EColorChecker Apple MacBook Air 15 M4: 13.25 ∆E min: 5.86 - max: 18.74 ∆E

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4

可持续性Apple 在其网站上提供了一份详细的环境报告。该设备由 55% 的可回收材料制成。

输入设备与前代机型相比,它的输入设备没有任何变化。这款笔记本电脑的键盘很舒适,但如果能增加一些键程就更好了。例如,ThinkPad X9 在这方面就有明显的优势。触觉触摸板依然运行出色,但Honor 或华为的竞争对手也在跟进,例如在边缘提供了额外的手势,这些手势由振动电机支持。因此,Apple 在这方面不再具有优势。

输入设备

键盘背光显示屏 - IPS,60 赫兹子像素阵列

几乎没有背光出血现在,MacBook Pro 配备了哑光显示屏,许多用户肯定希望 MacBook Air 能有更新,但遗憾的是,情况并非如此。但遗憾的是,MacBook Air 并没有这样做。它仍然使用我们熟悉的 IPS 屏幕,画质依然非常出色,没有任何 PWM 闪烁现象。亮度和色温都可以自动调节。它的频率也仍然是 60 赫兹,这在运动时会很明显。一些竞争对手在这方面做得更好。

它的亮度超过 500 cd/m²,我们对它的黑阶或对比度没有太多的批评。它的出厂校准非常好,完全覆盖了 P3 色彩空间。即使在最大亮度下,背光也几乎没有出血现象,响应时间也很好。

476cd/m²501cd/m²513cd/m²503cd/m²525cd/m²517cd/m²509cd/m²546cd/m²525cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 546 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 512.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %Center on Battery: 525 cd/m²Contrast: 1641:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}88.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 7010 K

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 HzApple MacBook Air 15 M3IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6", 60 HzLenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 HzMicrosoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteSharp LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 HzLenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraCSOT T3 MNF307ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 HzAsus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonATNA56AC03-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 HzDisplay-0%3%-0% Display P3 Coverage98.798.7 0%100 1%98.8 0% sRGB Coverage10099.9 0%100 0%100 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage88.387.8 -1%94.6 7%87.5 -1%Response Times-6%97%-70%-2%97% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *33.2 ?(10.5, 12.7)35.3 ?(16.4, 17.9) -6%1.46 ?(0.7, 0.76) 96%44.4 ?(21.3, 23.1) -34%27 ?(13, 14) 19%0.61 ?(0.3, 0.31) 98% Response Time Black / White *14.7 ?(4.6, 10.1)15.6 ?(5.2, 10.4) -6%0.44 ?(0.24, 0.2) 97%30.3 ?(15.9, 14.4) -106%17.9 ?(8.7, 9.2) -22%0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33) 95% PWM Frequency1200 ?(77)240 ?(100) PWM Amplitude *22Screen8%403%20%-4%155%Brightness middle525526 0%509 -3%579.9 10%509 -3%378 -28%Brightness513506 -1%508 -1%576 12%479 -7%379 -26%Brightness Distribution8792 6%97 11%92 6%90 3%98 13%Black Level *0.320.37 -16%0.01 97%0.34 -6%0.32 -0%0.02 94%Contrast16411422 -13%50900 3002%1706 4%1591 -3%18900 1052%Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.71.4 18%1.1 35%0.96 44%2.47 -45%1 41%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *42 50%2.5 37%2.39 40%4.73 -18%2.6 35%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.72.1 22%1.5 44%1.4 48%1.5 44%1.2 56%Gamma2.2 100%2.23 99%2.28 96%2.13 103%2.19 100%2.19 100%CCT7010 93%6865 95%6294 103%6407 101%6790 96%6460 101%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *0.61.06Total Average (Program / Settings)1% /

4%168% /

263%-25% /

2%-2% /

-3%126% /

143%* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰度

CalMAN 饱和度

CalMAN 色彩检查器

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White14.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise↘ 10.1 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.5 ms rise↘ 12.7 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8283 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下

室外(无阳光直射的晴朗天气)

视角稳定性性能 - MacBook Air 现配备高达 32GB 内存

处理器 - M4 SoC我们已经熟悉了 M4 SoC它的整体性能再次非常出色。M4 在测试设备内的最大功耗为 20.5 瓦,但在我们的测试过程中,功耗迅速降低,并在连续负载 20 分钟后最终稳定在 9 瓦(1 分钟后约为 15.5 瓦;5 分钟后为 12 瓦)。因此,它的多核性能略低于 MacBook Pro,但总体上仍然非常出色,特别是考虑到它运行 Cinebench 2024 多核测试的时间(几分钟)。30 分钟后,它的性能为 776 分,仅比 Lunar Lake 竞争对手低 11%,因此仍优于 Lunar Lake 竞争对手。在更短的 Geekbench 测试中,它的表现甚至更好。

不过,M4 的真正亮点是其巨大的单核性能,它不必躲避其较大的同胞兄弟 M4 Pro/Max。根据不同的基准测试,M4 的性能比目前的 Lunar Lake 或快速 Snapdragon 双核 Turbo 机型高出 30-45%。一如既往,它在电池模式下的性能绝对稳定。

CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core CPU Performance Rating

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z

99.5 pt Average Apple M4 (10 cores)

98.1 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

96 pt Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

79.7 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

76.4 pt Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

72 pt Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

69.2 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

68.6 pt Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z

986 Points +13%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

956 Points +9%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

926 Points +6%Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (815 - 986, n=5)

921 Points +5%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

874 Points Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

630 Points -28%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

598 Points -32%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

574 Points -34%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core

Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (173 - 177, n=5)

174.2 Points +1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z

174 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

173 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

142 Points -18%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

123 Points -29%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

120 Points -31%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

119.7 Points -31%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

108 Points -38%Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z

15128 Points +2%Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (14690 - 15173, n=6)

14978 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

14901 Points Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

14256 Points -4%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

14220 Points -5%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

7596 Points -49%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

7596 Points -49%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

12066 Points -19%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

11037 Points -26%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

10952 Points -27%Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core

Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (3655 - 3838, n=6)

3747 Points +3%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z

3673 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

3655 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

3130 Points -14%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

2812 Points -23%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

1896 Points -48%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

1896 Points -48%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

2795 Points -24%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

2680 Points -27%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2454 Points -33%

Power Consumption: Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z

13.6 Points per Watt +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

13.5 Points per Watt Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPUM3 8-Core GPU, M3

12.7 Points per Watt -6%Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QAAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

8.28 Points per Watt -39%Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SAArc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN

6.04 Points per Watt -55%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

5.89 Points per Watt -56%Honor MagicBook Art 14 SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Micron MT001TAYAX8U40

5.86 Points per Watt -57%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

5.25 Points per Watt -61%Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CAArc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00

3.9 Points per Watt -71%Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB

3.68 Points per Watt -73%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3.64 Points per Watt -73%Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073WRadeon 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02

2.62 Points per Watt -81%Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

33.7 Points per Watt Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPUM3 8-Core GPU, M3

28.3 Points per Watt -16%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z

24.8 Points per Watt -26%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

22.2 Points per Watt -34%Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333WRadeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

19.7 Points per Watt -42%Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CAArc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00

18.5 Points per Watt -45%Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QAAdreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

17.9 Points per Watt -47%Honor MagicBook Art 14 SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Micron MT001TAYAX8U40

17.1 Points per Watt -49%Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073WRadeon 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02

14.7 Points per Watt -56%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

14.1 Points per Watt -58%Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2025Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Core 5 220H, YMTC PC411-1TB

12.9 Points per Watt -62%Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SAArc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN

12.3 Points per Watt -64%Power Consumption: Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Cinebench R23 Multi Core12335 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core2165 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core173 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core874 Points

Help... in comparisonCinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparisonAsus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min)

N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs91 ...Dell Inspiron 16 7640 2-in-1 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core866HP EliteBook 845 G11 R7 PRO 8840HS, Radeon 780M869Chuwi Aubox, R7 8745HS R7 8745HS, Radeon 780M869Apple MacBook Air 15 M4

M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU874Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN374070 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU875Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M880SCHENKER XMG Evo 15 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core882 ...

(max)

TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation5372

系统性能非晶态内存标记全新 MacBook Air 15 M4 是一款速度极快的笔记本电脑,其合成基准测试结果令人印象深刻。在跨平台的 CrossMark 测试中,MacBook 的性能超过了整个 Windows 竞争产品。标准配置为 16GB 内存,现在可以选择最大 32GB 内存(需额外支付 400 美元)。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total CrossMark / Overall

Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU (1944 - 2066, n=4)

2010 Points +2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

1978 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

1857 Points -6%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

1742 Points -12%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

1663 Points -16%Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=68, last 2 years)

1600 Points -19%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

1385 Points -30%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

978 Points -51%CrossMark / Productivity

Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU (1797 - 1933, n=4)

1881 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

1871 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

1728 Points -8%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

1684 Points -10%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

1612 Points -14%Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=68, last 2 years)

1532 Points -18%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

1303 Points -30%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

913 Points -51%CrossMark / Creativity

Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU (2298 - 2420, n=4)

2365 Points +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

2298 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

2210 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

1977 Points -14%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

1862 Points -19%Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=68, last 2 years)

1785 Points -22%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

1496 Points -35%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1090 Points -53%CrossMark / Responsiveness

Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU (1393 - 1569, n=4)

1505 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

1490 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

1367 Points -8%Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=68, last 2 years)

1327 Points -11%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

1322 Points -11%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

1320 Points -11%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

1301 Points -13%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

869 Points -42%WebXPRT 3 / Overall

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

479 Points Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU (430 - 479, n=4)

464 Points -3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

448 Points -6%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

444 Points -7%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

419 Points -13%Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=68, last 2 years)

318 Points -34%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

306 Points -36%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

291 Points -39%WebXPRT 4 / Overall

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

348 Points Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU (315 - 348, n=4)

333 Points -4%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

315 Points -9%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

313 Points -10%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

285 Points -18%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

284 Points -18%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

281 Points -19%Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=68, last 2 years)

270 Points -22%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total

Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=74, last 2 years)

497 ms * -79%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V

474 ms * -70%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00

471 ms * -69%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

454.4 ms * -63%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

399.4 ms * -43%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z

363.1 ms * -30%Average Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU (262 - 319, n=4)

281 ms * -1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z

278.4 ms * * ... smaller is better

存储设备非晶磁盘标记现在它的内存至少是 16GB,但 MacBook 的固态硬盘容量仍然是 256GB。我们测试设备中的 1TB SSD(板载)使其总价提高了 600 美元之多。它的传输速度不是特别快,最高只有 3GB/s,但对于日常使用来说已经足够了。首次启动设备后,用户可以使用 955 GB 的容量。

No HDD benchmark entry found!

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test: 5GB Read | 5GB Write Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Read

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z

5401.3 MB/s +86%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple SSD AP1024Z

5175 MB/s +78%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple SSD AP1024Z

5060.9 MB/s +74%Average Apple SSD AP1024Z (2797 - 5175, n=8)

3667 MB/s +26%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple SSD AP0512Z

3028 MB/s +4%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z

2947.8 MB/s +2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple SSD AP1024Z

2904 MB/s Average of class Subnotebook (2833 - 2948, n=4, last 2 years)

2898 MB/s 0%Apple Mac Mini M4Apple SSD AP0256Z

1326.6 MB/s -54%Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Write

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z

6713.2 MB/s +122%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple SSD AP1024Z

6431 MB/s +113%Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxApple SSD AP1024Z

6242.8 MB/s +106%Average Apple SSD AP1024Z (2873 - 6431, n=8)

4218 MB/s +39%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple SSD AP0512Z

3426 MB/s +13%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z

3217.8 MB/s +6%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple SSD AP1024Z

3023.9 MB/s Average of class Subnotebook (1988 - 3243, n=4, last 2 years)

2868 MB/s -5%Apple Mac Mini M4Apple SSD AP0256Z

1927.7 MB/s -36%

图形卡在我们的测试中,配备 10 个内核的 M4 GPU 性能非常出色,尤其是在与 Lunar Lake iGPU 直接比较时。它的性能也与 M4 MacBook Pro 相当--至少在短期基准测试中是如此。在较长的负载情况下,图形处理器的性能下降了约 22%。它的游戏性能也相当不错,尽管原生游戏(如本例中的《博德之门 3》)的可用性仍然是限制因素。

3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Score | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Extreme Unlimited GFXBench: 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen Geekbench 6.4: GPU Metal | GPU OpenCL 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

3932 Points +2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

3839 Points Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (3583 - 3989, n=5)

3787 Points -1%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

3227 Points -16%Average of class Subnotebook (1034 - 3839, n=24, last 2 years)

2545 Points -34%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

2000 Points -48%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

9162 Points +5%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

8735 Points Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (7335 - 9162, n=4)

8480 Points -3%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

7331 Points -16%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

6303 Points -28%Average of class Subnotebook (659 - 8735, n=26, last 2 years)

5691 Points -35%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

9628 Points +6%Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (8457 - 9636, n=5)

9140 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

9092 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3

8286 Points -9%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

7068 Points -22%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

6323 Points -30%Average of class Subnotebook (2798 - 9092, n=31, last 2 years)

6212 Points -32%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

59.8 fps +7%Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (48.6 - 63.1, n=5)

56.5 fps +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

55.9 fps Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3

52.6 fps -6%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

49.6 fps -11%Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 88.9, n=19, last 2 years)

39.3 fps -30%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

136.6 fps +11%Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (105.4 - 144, n=5)

124.8 fps +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

123.3 fps Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3

120 fps -3%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

105.7 fps -14%Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 123.3, n=18, last 2 years)

80.7 fps -35%Geekbench 6.4 / GPU Metal

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

57998 Points +6%Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (53465 - 57998, n=4)

56075 Points +2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

54887 Points Average of class Subnotebook (47686 - 54887, n=4, last 2 years)

49576 Points -10%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3

47699 Points -13%Geekbench 6.4 / GPU OpenCL

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

38291 Points +6%Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (36135 - 38291, n=3)

37441 Points +4%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

36135 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3

30470 Points -16%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

29175 Points -19%Average of class Subnotebook (9487 - 52427, n=73, last 2 years)

27736 Points -23%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

27248 Points -25%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

20551 Points -43%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

20104 Points -44%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

15316 Points -58%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

15316 Points -58%

3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score

3839 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score

3851 pointsHelp

Blender: v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3

129 Seconds * -25%Average of class Subnotebook (103 - 134, n=4, last 2 years)

119 Seconds * -16%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

103 Seconds * Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (n=1)

103 Seconds * -0%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU

Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

593 Seconds * -46%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

584 Seconds * -44%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

545 Seconds * -35%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

533 Seconds * -32%Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=71, last 2 years)

528 Seconds * -30%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3

491 Seconds * -21%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)

405 Seconds * Average Apple M4 10-core GPU (n=1)

405 Seconds * -0%Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel

Average of class Subnotebook (195 - 368, n=10, last 2 years)

242 Seconds * Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

210 Seconds * * ... smaller is better

Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Total War Pharaoh | Shadow of the Tomb Raider Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU

50.3 (43min) fps +80%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU

31.6 fps +13%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU

27.9 fps Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V

25.5 fps -9%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V

24.1 fps -14%Average of class Subnotebook (12.1 - 32.2, n=52, last 2 years)

22.9 fps -18%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU

19 fps -32%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

17.1 fps -39%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

16.9 fps -39%Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU

35.7 (29min) fps +98%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V

28.2 (23.1min) fps +57%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V

26.9 (22.4min, 21.6P1) fps +49%Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=58, last 2 years)

21.2 fps +18%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU

20.4 fps +13%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V

18.3 (14.1min) fps +2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU

18 fps Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

14.4 (11.2min) fps -20%Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU

51.4 (42min) fps +46%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU

39.9 fps +13%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU

35.2 fps Average of class Subnotebook (16.7 - 50, n=9, last 2 years)

31.4 fps -11%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU

28 fps -20%Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro EntryApple M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU

76 (56min) fps +124%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU

41 fps +21%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V

37 (23min) fps +9%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU

34 fps Average of class Subnotebook (30 - 34, n=4, last 2 years)

31.5 fps -7%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU

30 fps -12%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

No graph data

lowmed.highultraShadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

106

43

39

34

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

44.7

34.2

29.8

27.9

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)

32.5

26.1

21.9

18

Total War Pharaoh (2023)

51.1

45.7

44.5

35.2

排放与能源噪音排放MacBook Air 15 继续采用被动散热方式,因此在任何情况下都能保持完全静音,这与其 Windows 竞争对手相比简直是巨大的优势。

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024ZApple MacBook Air 15 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512ZLenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQLenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256VAsus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMNoiseoff / environment *24.423.323.224.3Idle Minimum *24.423.323.224.3Idle Average *24.423.323.224.3Idle Maximum *24.423.326.126.2Load Average *35.825.730.932.5Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *39.431.134.135.2Load Maximum *4533.244.339.8* ... smaller is better

温度尽管采用了被动散热,但在我们的测试中,笔记本电脑的表面温度并不苛刻,即使在满载的情况下,我们测得的最高温度也只有 45 °C。因此,在正常的日常使用中,MacBook Air 始终保持非常凉爽。即使是 35 瓦的电源也没有过热,最高温度为 43 °C。在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中,SoC 的功耗最初为 29 瓦,但很快降至 9 瓦左右。

Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

42 °C44.9 °C37.4 °C 39.4 °C38.7 °C35.4 °C 33.4 °C29.7 °C31.8 °C

Maximum: 44.9 °CAverage: 37 °C

39.1 °C43.9 °C41.2 °C38.2 °C40.2 °C39 °C32.2 °C33.5 °C33.7 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °CAverage: 37.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 43.1 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

23.3 °C23.4 °C23.2 °C 23.2 °C23.2 °C23 °C 23 °C22.9 °C22.9 °C

Maximum: 23.4 °CAverage: 23.1 °C

23.2 °C23.5 °C23.5 °C23 °C23.3 °C23.2 °C23.1 °C23.2 °C23.2 °C

Maximum: 23.5 °CAverage: 23.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 27.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

41.8 °C44.6 °C38 °C 38.3 °C39.2 °C35.5 °C 35.5 °C30.5 °C32.1 °C

Maximum: 44.6 °CAverage: 37.3 °C

40.7 °C42.9 °C41.5 °C36.7 °C40.4 °C39.6 °C32.2 °C33.6 °C33.9 °C

Maximum: 42.9 °CAverage: 37.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 42.8 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.5 °C / 95.9 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-7.3 °C / -13.1 F).

表面温度应力测试(顶部)

表面温度应力测试(底部)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPUApple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPULenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140VMicrosoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSLenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140VAsus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSHeat1%2%6%-21%-12%Maximum Upper Side *44.944.3 1%42.1 6%45.4 -1%46.2 -3%43.6 3%Maximum Bottom *43.943.4 1%39.5 10%37.2 15%41 7%53.1 -21%Idle Upper Side *23.423.1 1%24.5 -5%22.4 4%34 -45%26.7 -14%Idle Bottom *23.523.3 1%24.4 -4%22 6%33.8 -44%27.2 -16%* ... smaller is better

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø4 (3.391-14.396) Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø3.02 (2.13-17.607) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø13.8 (9.944-20.067) Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø5.15 (3.976-15.028) Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø9.82 (7.515-15.154) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø15.4 (14.797-18.184)

发言人Mac 的音响系统没有变化,仍然由 6 个扬声器组成,整体质量非常好,但竞争对手已经迎头赶上,达到了相当的水平。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量其功耗值与前代机型基本相同。IPS 面板在全亮度条件下仍然需要相对较高的电量,Air 的耗电量也高于同类产品。在压力测试中,35 瓦的电源仅在几秒钟内起到了限制作用,总的来说是足够的,但同时为电池充电似乎没有太多的储备。可免费选配 70 瓦电源。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.17 / 0.3 WattIdle 2.2 / 11.5 / 11.6 Watt

Load

34.5 / 37.5 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"Apple MacBook Air 15 M3M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6"Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionCore Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3"Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteSD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraCore Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3"Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonSD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"Power Consumption1%-16%-28%-42%-30%Idle Minimum *2.22.15 2%2.4 -9%3 -36%3.4 -55%4.4 -100%Idle Average *11.511.2 3%3.9 66%8.3 28%8.8 23%6.2 46%Idle Maximum *11.611.5 1%5.1 56%8.4 28%9.3 20%7.5 35%Load Average *34.535.8 -4%42.5 -23%34.3 1%45.4 -32%33.6 3%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *24.443.5 -78%45.8 -88%49.4 -102%39 -60%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *26.240.2 -53%41 -56%44.8 -71%38.9 -48%Load Maximum *37.537.2 1%64.4 -72%65.2 -74%66.3 -77%69.3 -85%Witcher 3 ultra *29.629.9* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø36.4 (34.7-37.5) Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.76 (4.73-4.92) Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø24.4 (23.2-28.1)

Power consumption with external monitor

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø11.9 (11.2-16.5) Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø29.7 (26.6-37.3) Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.81 (2.77-2.91) Apple MacBook Air 15 M4; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø26.2 (22.7-31.6)

运行时间与旧型号相比,它的电池续航时间变化很小。在 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中,我们注意到它的续航时间为 16.5 小时,而在全亮度条件下,它的续航时间仅为 6:45 小时--这与它的消耗值相符。在视频测试中,Air 实现了近 19 个小时的运行时间。考虑到电池容量,这些结果都不错,但 ThinkPad X9 在所有情况下(尤其是最大亮度下)的续航时间都更长。在使用 35 瓦电源的情况下,其充电时间长达 02:44小时。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

16h 28min

WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness

6h 45min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

18h 54min

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 66.5 WhApple MacBook Air 15 M3M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 66.5 WhLenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionCore Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 WhMicrosoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteSD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 64 WhLenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraCore Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 WhAsus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonSD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 WhAverage of class Subnotebook Battery Runtime1%14%-10%-5%-22%-17%H.26411341116 -2%1378 22%976 -14%885 -22%993 ?(595 - 1425, n=29, last 2 years) -12%WiFi v1.39881016 3%1048 6%889 -10%1025 4%783 -21%783 ?(389 - 1585, n=69, last 2 years) -21%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Back to the verdict

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4

- 03/11/2025 v8

Andreas Osthoff

Chassis88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard91%

Pointing Device99%

Connectivity65 / 74 → 87%

Weight69 / 20-77 → 86%

Battery91%

Display86%

Games Performance58 / 75 → 78%

Application Performance92 / 92 → 100%

Temperature88%

Noise100%

Audio91 / 91 → 100%

Camera48 / 75 → 64%

Average75%

91%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions77.4%Materials50%Packaging100%Power Use90.4%Repairability0%Software Updates50% Total Sustainability Score: 61.3%

Possible alternatives compared

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay

1.91.2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $999.00Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in...2. $799.00Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-in...3. $1,369.00Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in...List Price: 1999€1.5 kg11.5 mm15.30"2880x1864224 PPIIPS

2.90.1%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,649.99Lenovo ThinkPad X9 14 Aura E...2. $1,844.05Lenovo ThinkPad X9 15 Gen 1 ...3. $2,024.95Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Gen 1 ...List Price: 1989€1.4 kg17.7 mm15.30"2880x1800222 PPIOLED

3.84.3%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSDAmazon: $1,148.84List Price: 1100 USD1.7 kg18.29 mm15.00"2496x1664200 PPIIPS

4.84.3%Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraIntel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘16 GB MemoryAmazon: 1. $1,248.99Lenovo Slim 7i Aura Copilot+...2. $15.88MUBUY-GOL Anti Blue Light Sc...3. $1,249.00Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 La...List Price: 1380 USD1.5 kg13.9 mm15.30"2880x1800222 PPIIPS

5.83.3%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,119.99ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C...2. $1,199.99ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C...3. $1,329.99ASUS Vivobook S 15; Copilot+...List Price: 1299€1.4 kg15.9 mm15.60"2880x1620212 PPIOLED

6.91.6% v7 (old)Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 10-Core GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 2059€1.5 kg11.5 mm15.60"2880x1664IPS

More articles related to this deviceApple MacBook Air 15 M4 (MacBook Air 15 M4 Series)

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 460 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 604101 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

相关文章

完整的蓝牙模块指南 2025: 特征 & 使用案例
清理手机空间
攻略:烈焰征途沙漠五图专精点及技能点路线图